Google Buys Motorola Mobility: Don’t Let The Smoke Get In Your Eyes

There has been a lot of focus and fuss over the value and cost of the patents involved in the Google/Motorola transaction.

While Google’s Android market share growth is on a fast track, so are the lawsuits over patent violations, the complaints about platform fragmentation and interest about how the company will drive profits because of continuing investment in Android.

And to be sure, I have my views, but in a nut shell this whole acquisition deal raises more questions about the direction of Google – and the Android eco-system at large – then the clarity it creates. There are many moving parts. But at the end of the day, having thought about this for 36+ hours, it really comes down to two scenario’s.

1. By the end of 2012 Google will exit the hardware business completely, meaning it will dissolve Motorola Mobility in whole or part through sale or dissolution.

or…

2. By 2015 Google aspires to be a dominating force in hardware and distribution – likely attempting to mimic Apple‘s vertical solution model.

What do you think?

- Bob

LinkedInGoogle ReaderEvernoteBox.netRedditWordPressDeliciousInstapaperRead It LaterFriendFeedShare

Nokia slips from 1 to 3 in smartphone sales

It’s no surprise that there is a lot of summer ice in Finland this year – and Nokia continues to slide. The slide itself, is not unexpected and is most likely already priced into the stock, but concerns of the duration and the depth continue to rise. [Read more...]

LinkedInGoogle ReaderEvernoteBox.netRedditWordPressDeliciousInstapaperRead It LaterFriendFeedShare

Traffic monitoring just getting started

..and apparently VC’s recognize the opportunity.
Inrix raises $37mil for international expansion, largest VC round in Seattle so far this year. [Read more...]

LinkedInGoogle ReaderEvernoteBox.netRedditWordPressDeliciousInstapaperRead It LaterFriendFeedShare

Nokia Ignored America – Is it now ignoring its own assets?

Nokia ignored America

Is it now ignoring its own assets?

Amplify’d from blogs.hbr.org

The Real Cause of Nokia’s Crisis

Nokia’s technology isn’t a root cause of its current crisis. Don’t blame its engineers and designers either. The company still knows how to innovate. There’s a simpler and more strategic explanation for why this once-perennial market leader became second-rate.

Nokia ignored America. The company simply refused to compete energetically, ingeniously and respectfully in the U.S. America was treated as an innovation afterthought. Nokia tried to get away with preserving its market dominance in Europe and growing its leadership in Asia. The richest country in the world was, literally and figuratively, a third-class priority for the Finnish giant.

Read more at blogs.hbr.org

Enhanced by Zemanta
LinkedInGoogle ReaderEvernoteBox.netRedditWordPressDeliciousInstapaperRead It LaterFriendFeedShare

Microsoft and Nokia Tie Up In a Non-Exclusive Deal

Nokia will use Microsoft Windows Phone 7 as its primary smartphone platform. The deal is non exclusive. Nokia and Microsoft will closely collaborate on development, joint marketing initiatives and a shared development roadmap to align on the future evolution of mobile products. Bing will power Nokia’s search services across Nokia devices and services, giving customers access to Bing’s next generation search capabilities. Microsoft adCenter will provide search advertising services on Nokia’s line of devices and services. Nokia Maps and its Ovi store remain a key part of Nokia’s strategy.

Nokia will transition Symbian but says it expects to ship more than 150 million devices based on the the Symbian, while stoping short of committing to a complete sunset date.
Nokia said that Meego will become an open source initiative and expects to ship one MeeGo device in 2011, but my take here is that the MeeGo’s effort feel more like a science experiment, than a product strategy.

Clearly, this is a big win for Microsoft. For Nokia? No so much. At least for some period, Nokia is going to support three OS’s platforms.

Nokia also renamed its Executive Board as its new Leadership Team, consisting of executives including Mary McDowell and Niklas Savander. The company is also changing its structure: from April 1 it will divide itself into two  business units: Smart Devices and Mobile Phones, with the former focusing on high-end smartphones and the latter, mass-market mobile phones.

Enhanced by Zemanta
LinkedInGoogle ReaderEvernoteBox.netRedditWordPressDeliciousInstapaperRead It LaterFriendFeedShare

Did Microsoft’s Ballmer Keynote Get It Done At CES?

Image via CrunchBase

Steve Ballmer was on a mission during his keynote at CES. His mission was twofold. Defend the successes of Microsoft in 2010 and offer a glimpse of what the company intends to do in 2011 and beyond.

The problem with Ballmer’s keynote is that he played defense instead of offense. And that I think is the issue at Microsoft in general. Innovation is about offense and Microsoft’s defensive posture seems to be getting in its way.

Microsoft did have consumer successes in 2010. The company sold more than 50 million Xbox consoles worldwide, and there are now more than 36 million members of the Xbox Live gaming network. 8 million Xbox Kinect sensors, shipped to retailers in the first 60 days worldwide, which seems quite remarkable, but Ballmer stopped short of mentioning actual consumer sales numbers.

Steve talked about nine Windows Mobile phones on six carriers in 30 countries, with 20K registered developers, and 5500 apps in the store, but again, no mentioned about actual consumer purchases. Ballmer announced Windows mobile will get cut and paste features and the work on the device types for Sprint and Verizon will be finished in the first half of 2011– he stopped short of actually saying whether the operators are planning to make the phones available.

Frankly without consumer numbers the defense mission was not only weak, but feels like Ballmer squandered air time in a preeminent spotlight that he could have used to tell the world what Microsoft, the consumer company, was going to become.

On the positive side, Xbox is getting Netflix, Hulu and both will support Kinect gestures. Xbox will get some new games. Frankly theses were expected additions and I consider them table stakes to keep Xbox in the hunt. Another new feature coming is Avatar Kinect, which Xbox Live Gold members will get for free this Spring. The technology uses facial and body recognition to generate the avatars.

The big news from Microsoft was upstaged by its own pre conference press event.
Microsoft is porting a next iteration of Windows to a System on a Chip (SOC). In consumer terms this means it will take everything you know as the Windows operating and put it inside a semiconductor chip the size of your fingernail. The result will be faster performance and longer battery life in handhelds. This is formidable task and will require very close integration and open working relationships with partners. I suspect Ballmer anticipated the raised eyebrows that would come with such announcement by not only naming the active partners including Qualcomm and NVIDIA but also demoing live prototypes. Frankly that took guts. Though frankly when Microsoft announced Windows CE back in the 90’s for industrial class handhelds I thought the company was headed in the direction then – had they – its quite unlikely they would find themselves in the position they are today.

In the end, Ballmer played it safe. He stayed away from the tablet buzz, he didn’t take head on how Microsoft was going to counter Google TV, or Apple TV if at all, and finally I think underserved Microsoft’s interest in their detailing visions for evolving their Azure cloud offerings for consumers.

Did Ballmer get it down? Well no, but he didn’t get hurt either.

Enhanced by Zemanta
LinkedInGoogle ReaderEvernoteBox.netRedditWordPressDeliciousInstapaperRead It LaterFriendFeedShare

My Forbes Post: Microsoft Mobile: Impressive and Unique

Image representing Microsoft as depicted in Cr...

Image via CrunchBase

It’s a big day for Microsoft. The company had to step up and show the world that that innovation is still alive at Microsoft. The company was compelled to show it has both the talent and the fortitude to extend its dominant desktop and .NET platform and services effectively, cleanly and seamlessly to consumers and enterprise mobile. I have to admit I was skeptical, but my initial impressions are positive about what I’ve seen so far.

In an earlier post I discussed some of the more critical items I think Microsoft needed to address today. Let’s take a look how the company did.

  1. A blistering cool user interface that gets people talking.  Score 8 out of 10. The Interface seems very fast (we have no hands-on experience yet)  thanks in part to Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 1Ghz processor coupled with the multi-thread application environments in its new and unique application hub architecture. My one itch remains the square box icons that seem so 1980’s. I think Microsoft should worry less about mimicking Apple’s rounded icon look and just go ahead and use it.
  2. Socially seamless consumer experience.  Score 10/10. Twitter, Facebook, location, mapping, it’s all there – bravo. I think consumers will find this integration to make their mobile experience simple, intuitive and easy. Almost a no-brainer.
  3. Mobile Cloud solution for small business – Score 5/10. Sure, Microsoft Office is extended quite nicely into Windows Mobile 7, but I think the company really missed an opportunity to package up a suite of applications that speaks directly to the small business market. It will be interesting to see what routes Microsoft takes to create vertical applications and IT management tool packages for some of its major verticals including, but not limited to, Financial Services, Retail and Healthcare.
  4. Tools that allow IT to more easily embrace the consumerization of IT. Score 2 out of 10. Microsoft did virtually nothing to up its ante here. The OneNote find phone, wipe phone is a welcome addition for consumers, but I think the company missed an opportunity to launch with some enterprise business differentiation. Much of the launch feels, to me, a bit too consumer focused.
  5. A large application warehouse that has great developer incentives. Score 5 out 10. Microsoft didn’t hurt or help itself here. Most developers tell me it’s far easier to develop in the .NET environments, but with all the momentum on other platforms, the question remains how many developer converts we will see.

Overall, Microsoft scored a 6 out of a possible 10 against the items that I believe are critical to get its mobile share out of the dumpster. The carrier and handset manufacturer’s partners are strong. Content partners like Electronic Arts, a good first step. But all of these were table stakes, not differentiators.

Microsoft accomplished a major feat. It is back, it is innovating and it is very serious about becoming a contender in mobile.

The Forbes link http://bit.ly/aWzIo0

Enhanced by Zemanta
LinkedInGoogle ReaderEvernoteBox.netRedditWordPressDeliciousInstapaperRead It LaterFriendFeedShare

Will Microsoft Mobile Find Success? 5 Things We Need To Hear

Image representing Microsoft as depicted in Cr...

Image via CrunchBase

Today is a very important day for Microsoft – one that could very well determine the long term success of the company. At question is whether the company can muster the talent to either extend its’ dominate desktop franchise and architecture and put it into the wanting hands of mobile consumers, or redefine its position in the category completely, in what is already a very fragmented market.  Keep in mind; this is Microsoft’s 3rd or 4th reincarnation hailing as far back as its JV with Qualcomm – Wireless Knowledge.

With that in mind, here are five things I think we need to hear from Microsoft.

  1. A blistering cool user interface that gets people talking. Given what we’ve already heard, we know there is a new operating system (OS). How consumers feel when use the new OS is going to be key
  2. Socially seamless consumer experience.  Twitter, Facebook, Yelp, Foursquare, Gowalla plus email, instant messaging, music, picture and video sharing continue to be a growing daily digest of things people do – at home and on their mobile. If Microsoft can seduce consumers to its platform by making the social consumer experience simple and seamless, this may stand to differentiate the company from the field.
  3. Mobile Cloud solution for small business – The appetite for getting things done faster, simpler and at lower cost is an insatiable requirement in the small business market. This could be a big home run sector for Microsoft if it puts together a smart toolbox.
  4. Tools that allow IT to more easily embrace the consumerization of IT. Increasingly CIO’s and their IT staff are pushed against the wall to support the latest and greatest mobile handset. There is a growing IT policy be dammed attitude brewing that will come to a quick halt the minute some consumer, employee or regulatory infraction results in a lawsuit named after the offending company. Research in Motion (RIM) is the king here; Microsoft needs to go after RIM with both guns afire. Apple has some enterprise hooks, but similar to using the Android platform most CIO’s resort to third party solutions that result in raising the complexity of device management and the total cost of ownership of the mobile solutions.
  5. A large application warehouse that has great developer incentives. Nothing more need be said about this.

Clearly there are other basic items we need to hear including but not limited Microsoft’s hardware handset roadmap, carriers and content partners, but this list is a start of what I think could differentiate Microsoft in the mobile sector. What do you think we need to see?

Enhanced by Zemanta
LinkedInGoogle ReaderEvernoteBox.netRedditWordPressDeliciousInstapaperRead It LaterFriendFeedShare

Nokia’s World: The U.S. Problem

Image representing Nokia as depicted in CrunchBase

Image via CrunchBase

According to my most recent mobile device snapshot poll, there is no surprise that Blackberry continues to dominate the business market by some 20 points. That the Apple iPhone, especially in small business continues to gain share (more on that later) is clearly a worry from RIM. For all the hype of Android, is still a techies dream and remains no serious cause in the business market based on the responses. And Microsoft has all but lost its positions as a player in the business market with its mobile offering.

Nokia, who all but orphaned the enterprise device market a few years ago, is still the #1 player in the worldwide consumer market. However I believe if the company is going to reinvigorate itself Nokia would be well advised start thinking more about how to gain share in the business market. More and more consumers are pushing IT to support their choice of phone – case in point the iPhone. No consumer push, no support.

Few prosumers want or have to carry two phones. This should come as no surprise as this sort of work/personal device convergence aligns well with the new media, payment and communications convergence that is taking place.

What Smartphone device does your IT group support for you?

Disclosure: I am a Nokia shareholder

LinkedInGoogle ReaderEvernoteBox.netRedditWordPressDeliciousInstapaperRead It LaterFriendFeedShare